Monday 13 October 2008

New Poll: Should the ‘the tenancy for life’ for social housing tenants be scrapped as the CIH has recently proposed?

Please leave comments on the latest HSA poll here.

Ed.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is one of the most ridiculous policy suggestions I have heard for a long time. Not only does it totally undermine other important government agendas such as community-cohesion and mixed-communities, but it would also consign social housing to firmly becoming a marginal tenure of last resort. Surely, we need to avoid concentrations of poverty and deprivation in social housing not exacerbate it? Public housing like the NHS and state education, is a fundamental pillar (albeit a wobbly one) of the UK welfare state that everyone should have a right to access.

Anonymous said...

I agree with Kim, this suggestion would undermine any attempts to create mixed communities based on income and community-cohesion.

Furthermore, it ignores the fact that social housing is more than just a commodity - it is a person's home - people may have relationshps and connections in the area.

Unknown said...

As a social housing tenet who is now on a good income, I can tell you that even in the current downturn, buying a house is still a distant aspiration. If I were to be turfed out because I was deemed able to purchase housing on the open market, I would have to move many miles away from my current home in order to do so, which underlines Zhan's excellent comment on the nature of housing as more than just a commodity.